Jeeps (![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
jeeps) wrote in ![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
knockknock2010-02-01 04:25 am
jeeps) wrote in knockknock2010-02-01 04:25 am
Entry tags:
January Activity Check
⇨ OUR FIRST MONTH HAS CONCLUDED. Thank you so much for making it a success, guys, as well as for being patient while we've figured things out. Very soon we're going to put up an OOC post asking for your comments on what you like about the game so far and any suggestions you may have to improve it, so maybe let that percolate in your brain a bit in the meantime.
⇨ And now to get down to business! The following list of characters did not meet activity for the month and therefore have one strike. Don't worry too much if you're on here — just make sure you meet activity next month. If you need to refresh yourself on the requirements, they can be found in the rules.
bythebook
depraved
extra_ordinary
eye_for_an_i
instinct
offduty
selfevident
sorcerer
And the following characters are automatically removed for having no activity within the first month.
darthlizzie
If you have any questions about these, please comment or contact us.
⇨ On a somewhat related note, unless there are any protests, I would like to change the tag format for responses to prose logs. So far, the person who posts the log opener has tagged the entry with their character's ! tag, and all replies to the entry with plain tags. (So, to use some random examples, it looks something like this: !castiel, [prose log], rita mordio, spock, sebastian michaelis)
However, because responses to prose logs count as posts and not threads, it would be simpler for me if ALL prose responses were tagged with the ! tag, regardless of who posts the opener. (So it would look like this: !castiel, !rita mordio, !spock, !sebastian michaelis, [prose log])
If you have an thoughts on this, pro or con, go ahead and comment; otherwise I'll edit existing posts in a few days to reflect this.
⇨ And now to get down to business! The following list of characters did not meet activity for the month and therefore have one strike. Don't worry too much if you're on here — just make sure you meet activity next month. If you need to refresh yourself on the requirements, they can be found in the rules.
bythebookdepravedextra_ordinaryeye_for_an_iinstinctoffdutyselfevidentsorcererAnd the following characters are automatically removed for having no activity within the first month.
darthlizzieIf you have any questions about these, please comment or contact us.
⇨ On a somewhat related note, unless there are any protests, I would like to change the tag format for responses to prose logs. So far, the person who posts the log opener has tagged the entry with their character's ! tag, and all replies to the entry with plain tags. (So, to use some random examples, it looks something like this: !castiel, [prose log], rita mordio, spock, sebastian michaelis)
However, because responses to prose logs count as posts and not threads, it would be simpler for me if ALL prose responses were tagged with the ! tag, regardless of who posts the opener. (So it would look like this: !castiel, !rita mordio, !spock, !sebastian michaelis, [prose log])
If you have an thoughts on this, pro or con, go ahead and comment; otherwise I'll edit existing posts in a few days to reflect this.